ABRF Announces Executive Board Election Results

ABRF Members turned out in record numbers to elect two new members for the Executive Board.

Rich Cole, Research Scientist V, Director, Advanced Light Microscopy & Image Analysis Core, Wadsworth Center and Research Assistant Professor, Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Public Health State University of New York and Nancy C. Fisher, PhD, Director, UNC Flow Cytometry Core Facility and Professor of Microbiology & Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill were elected to serve a term of four (4) years on the Executive Board of ABRF. Their terms will commence immediately following the ABRF 2017 Annual Meeting in San Diego, California. Congratulations, Rich and Nancy!

The terms of Bill Hendrickson, President, and Paula Turpen, Treasurer, will conclude after the ABRF 2017 Annual Meeting. Thank you Bill and Paula for your outstanding leadership, hard work, and dedicated service to the ABRF and its membership.

ABRF Launches Annual Biomolecular Research Laboratory Census

abrf_2016_surveySubmitted by:  Christopher Colangelo

From 1989 to 2000, ABRF conducted and published 12 surveys on job Compensation and Employment in the biotechnology core laboratory. These surveys had a major impact on helping scientists, administrators, and NIH to promote the growth of core laboratory worldwide. As a way to continue this rich tradition, the current ABRF Executive Board and I have developed and relaunched an industry-wide Annual Biomolecular Research Laboratory Census.

The goal of this census is to learn about salary and employment trends in the biomolecular research laboratory marketplace, both non- and for-profit. The confidential census data will provide respondents the ability to benchmark their biomolecular research laboratory against others, both now and in the future, as well as help ABRF strengthen professional opportunities and employment-related incentives for biotechnology resource facilities. Census results will be made available to the industry via a peer reviewed research article and on the ABRF website.

Participation in this census is voluntary and we anticipate the census will take only 5-7 minutes to complete. We aim to collect data from as many research labs as possible and 100% participation from our current ABRF membership. Respondent identities will remain strictly confidential and all information will be analyzed in aggregate.

To participate in the census, please click HERE. The initial deadline for completing the census is June 15.

ABRF Announces Executive Board Election Results

ABRF Members turned out in near record numbers to elect two new members for the Executive Board.

Julie Auger, Associate Director, Research Core Facilities Program, University of California, Davis and Andy Chitty, Director, University Shared Resources, Oregon Health and Science University were elected to serve a term of four (4) years on the Executive Board of ABRF. Their terms will commence immediately following the ABRF 2016 Annual Meeting in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida. Congratulations, Julie and Andy!

The terms of Tim Hunter and Anoja Perera will conclude after the ABRF 2016 Annual Meeting. Thank you Tim and Anoja for your hard work and dedicated service to the ABRF and its membership.

Executive Board adds Two New Representatives: A Brief Interview with Allis and Peter

Allis Chen and Peter Lopez roll onto the Executive Board as our newly elected representatives after our annual meeting this month. Given their new roles in our community, we thought this blog would be a great place to help us get to know them better and even post some comments and questions for them.   Both, Peter and Allis will be attending the 2015 ABRF meeting in St. Louis this weekend.  Feel free to introduce yourself and welcome them.  Both Allis, Peter, and the rest of our Executive Board are interested in hearing more about your hopes and ideas for our association.

 

allis-chien

Allis Chien earned her Ph.D. from Stanford University — where she remains, fifteen years later.  (Some bonus trivia provided by Allis is that Stanford is the single largest employer of Stanford graduates!)

How did you come to be involved with cores?

I went through graduate school expecting to end up as a chemist in industry. Just as I was finishing up my thesis, Stanford needed someone to run a newly acquired ion trap mass spectrometer. Working with the instrument sounded like something fun to do while I searched for a “real” job. Setting up the core was merely necessary bookkeeping. Fortunately, I had a mentor and model in Al Smith and his Protein and Nucleic Acid Facility, just across campus. Al immediately introduced me to the ABRF, and the temporary job developed into a career. What I love most about my core career: 1) Helping people. 2) The variety — rather than delving deeply into one research project, I get to see such a breadth of research in so many fields. 3) Continuous growth and learning opportunities — in technology, research needs, and administration skills, as well as in unexpected areas such as lab construction, event planning, and even filming for TV. The job constantly changes along with the core’s expansion, and keeps life interesting.

What do you do when you are not working?

Life off campus is about spending time with my chemist husband and kindergartener son, who share an obsession with Legos. We’ve recently discovered geocaching as a fun (and free!) fresh air activity. As David grows up, I’m gradually scavenging time to reinstate lifelong interests and hobbies, including knitting, crocheting, reading, and supplying piano and/or vocals on our church’s worship team. Having a young child is also a great excuse to learn new skills like riding a scooter and sculpting balloon animals, and to enjoy picture books and silly songs.

What are your ideas for the future of ABRF?

In the current climate of funding fears and interdisciplinary science, cores are more relevant than ever. Increasingly, institutions are turning to cores as an efficient and cost-effective way to support research. With research projects standing on the legs of numerous technologies, it is essential to be conversant with technologies outside one’s own field. The combination of the ABRF’s administrative and many technological constituents makes it the premier place to learn and network. The ABRF serves a different — and more holistic — purpose than individual technology-based societies and meetings.

My vision of the ABRF is a thriving, “doing” society, active in what ABRF folk do best — helping. The strength and heart of the ABRF is in its members. In helping its members and cores and thereby their respective users and institutions, the ABRF will simultaneously publicize its activities, grow its membership, and maintain healthy relationships with its sponsors.

 

peter-lopez Peter Lopez has been involved in shared research facility leadership for most of his 38 year career in flow cytometry, managing core facilities at Fox Chase Cancer Center, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, The Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center (including imaging and sequencing cores) and currently at the NYU Langone Medical Center. He has been intimately involved in flow cytometric application and instrument development, the latter while at Cytomation, the company who developed the MoFlo high-speed cell sorter. He formed the Boston User Group (BUG) in 1994, is currently the President of the MetroFLow (NY/NJ) flow cytometry user group, as well as President of NERLSCD.

How did you come to be involved with cores?

I started out with core labs when my second job took me to Fox Chase Cancer Institute in 1982, working with immunologist Dr. Donald Mosier. I learned the importance of well-run cores as a facilitator of basic research, and Don gave me a lot of latitude in the lab to learn the art. During this time I started (in 1986) a then-informal gathering at the ISAC annual conference (CYTO) to discuss “core” related issues. This meeting continues  to this day as the SRL Manager’s Forum , which occurs as a well-attended event within the ISAC meeting and draws almost 300 attendees . I thank Sheenah Mische who I work with at NYULMC for pointing me in the direction of ABRF, and I’ve been a member since 2010.

What do you do when you are not working?

My wife would probably say “Too much! ”. I always have some home improvement project underway (well, maybe more than one) , but try to  fit in time to enjoy good meals home or out. I usually cook at home since I’ve cooked professionally. I also enjoy wine, and keep a small cellar. My wife and I enjoy bicycling, and well, we both like to shop. I am always in search of our next best house cocktail. I garden every year with underwhelming results. I’ve always built all of our home computers for the last 20 years. I have a 1983 convertible that I like to drive when it’s nice outside. I have been known to enjoy playing squash, downhill skiing, camping, and High-Powered Rocketry (don’t worry– it’s a legal and licensed activity), and hope to get back to active status with some of these past interests before I forget how to participate.

What are your ideas for the future of ABRF?

Towards the goal of better experimental reproducibility (and solidifying the important role of cores in scientific research), I would be interested in exploring the following questions:

  • Can ABRF propose a best practices policy where journals would require authors to indicate at time of submission if institutional core facilities were used in generating data for a manuscript (or not)?
  • Can ABRF market itself as the source for SRL-technology experts which would serve the community by providing ad hoc review of the technical aspects of a manuscript?
  • Can ABRF become involved at some level in acknowledging cores that adhere to best practices for their respective core technology?

As I have a strong commitment to the educational component of cores, I am in favor of the ABRF expanding its educational mission:

  • Can ABRF members generate ABRF-branded educational material for delivery either in a classroom setting, at meetings, or via the Web?
  • Can ABRF generate material to be used as a reference for academic HR groups to better define career tracks for core facility professionals?

I would be interested in seeing enhanced interaction between ABRF and its Chapters. The affiliates and chapters can be a great source for maintaining or increasing ABRF membership.  I would be in favor of offering an ABRF membership discount to attendees of regional chapter meetings.

The ABRF should continue to investigate membership demographics at both the regional and international meeting levels to note trends, new or underrepresented core technologies, and respond to this information with new initiatives, both at the regional and international settings.

ABRF 2014 Executive Board (EB) Elections – Your vote COUNTS!

It is that time of year again!vote

Time to choose 2 people to serve on the Executive Board and work on the team charged with steering our “ABRF ship”. In typical ABRF fashion, the “Final 4” nominees are all very strong candidates. To help us get started evaluating who we would like at the helm of our association, let’s look at one of the things that sets them apart from each other. Continue reading